This paper reviews a variety of cultural e topractices which helped the Indian society maintain an approximate ecological steady state with the wild living resources from around 500 B.C. to 1800 A.D, The Indian society is made up of a large number of endogamous castes each with a restricted geographical range and each with a hereditary profession. This hereditary profession is so specialized that the different castes directly dependent on natural resources utilize the different resources with little overlap with other castes of the same region. Thus any particular resources of a given region used to be utilized over generations by a small homogeneous breeding group which expected the same resource to sustain its future generations as well. These conditions were particularly favorable for the evolution of cultural traits ensuring long-term sustainable utilization of natural resources. Such practices included restraints on territory over which a given human group may exploit the plants and animals, the season in which the exploitation is permitted, the sex and stage rr? life history for which exploitation is permitted, the method which may be used for exploitation, the species or the biological communities which may never be exploited and the species in the exploitation of which a given caste may be specialized. This equilibrium could be maintained because the ruling classes only tapped the agricultural surplus and a few select harvests from the wild such as musk and sandalwood. After the industrial revolution, however, many other raw materials including wood acquired commercial value, so that the forests, lakes, rivers and seas which were earlier left'to the local communities with the exception of hunting preserves of the princes now became a resource coveted by the ruling classes. Hence, the British Government wrested the control of these resources away from the Indian population as soon as they consolidated their hold on the country. The commercial interests which have been exploiting these resources since that time are only interested in immediate profit and have no stake in the long term preservation of these resources. India's wild living resources have therefore been steadily depleted, and the old social restraints on preservation of these resources are breaking down. Apart from the depletion of natural resources, this pattern of development has contributed further to the impoverishment of the rural population which still largely depends on the wild'living resources to meet many of their basic needs. It is now necessary to change this non-sustain-abfer and inequitable pattern of development, restore to the local population a measure of control over their resources and reinforce the traditional praciices of restraints on resource utilization. The Chipko movement in the Himalayas provides a ray of hope that we may indeed have begun to move in that direction.
The continued existence of populations of all species of animals, including man, depends on the availability of a variety of resources. The population can crash and run the risk of extinction if the availability of any of the critical resources falls below a threshold value. But the availability of a resource will itself be affected by the animal population utilizing that resource. It may therefore happen that the utilization of a resource by an animal population may reduce to levels at which that animal population can no longer sustain itself and may go extinct. In a book that has provoked such debate, Wynne-Edwards (1962) suggested that most animal species have evolved mechanisms of populations tend to reduce the availability of various resources that they utilize to levels at which the population may occasionally go extinct, but more commonly exists in a balance such that it cannot increase any further (Lack 1954, Hutchinson- 1978). Human populations appear to behave in a, basically similar fashion, increasing in size till the resources they depend on are depleted to a level at which the population cannot increase any further. This is however not the whole story, for with his symbolic language and cultural transmission of knowledge, man has acquired a vastly greater capacity of deliberately manipulating nature around him. This has enabled him to tremendously augment the resources which he can put to his own use, and it has also permitted the cultural evolution of socially exercised restraints on the utilization of resources (Harris, 1974, 1977). Man has in fact behaved from time to time as a truly prudent predator.
However such prudence is far from a universal feature of human societies which have often totally wiped out the resources which sustained them, and in fact we seem today to be headed towards a global destruction of the resource base which sustains humanity (Martin and Wright 1967, Brown 1978, Ehrlich 1980). An understanding of the conditions under which human societies did evolve effective methods of prudent utilization of the resources", and of the circumstances under which these practices broke down is therefore of vital importance in our endeavor to steer ourselves on to a course of sustainable utilization of the earth's resources (Gadgil, 1983), The present paper is an attempt to review this problem in the context of the Indian experience.
The Indian society is made up of thousands of closed, self-governing communities .or castes. Each of these castes still is, or till recently used to be, characterized by the following four significant attributes :
- Each caste is an endogamous group, i.e. all marriages are restricted within the caste. This is still by and large true particularly in the rural areas.
- Each caste is distributed over a restricted geographical region. This is also still by and large true except that a few major urban-industrial centres have brought together a large number of people of all castes outside their traditional range of geographical distribution.
- Each caste is governed by a caste council which settles all disputes within the caste. This always was and continues to be more so with the lower predominantly rural castes. However the power of caste councils is being rapidly eroded.
- Each caste possesses a hereditary way of making a living. This again was and is much more true of the lower, predominantly rural castes. These are the castes which depend most directly J on the natural resources and traditionally each caste had a particular and often rather restricted way of utilizing the natural resources over its range of distribution. For example, in a region, one caste may catch freshwater fish, a second keep sheep, a third keep ducks, a. fourth make salt from the sea water, a2fifth maintain coconut orchards and so on. In addition, there would be castes I of specialized artisans, entertainers, priests etc. Each small geographical region is .a mosaic of populations of a number of sedentary castes, on the order of ten to fifty, living together, yet independently, within that region. The same region would be visited by another ten to fifty nomadic or semi-nomadic castes ' of artisans and entertainers. These wandering castes would also have a very fixed geographic region over which they would move. 'All these castes had set Up relationships of barter with each other.
This rural society was to a large extent self - sustaining. It produced most of its own requirements within its own limits: Its interaction with the urban society was restricted to surrendering 'a fraction, sometimes moderate but sometimes exorbitantly high of the surplus of agricultural production.
This social mosaic had developed over several centuries of interactions amongst a large number of tribal groups which had migrated into India at different times, the endogamous castes being very likely derivatives of endogamous tribal groups (Karve 1961). While the lower rural castes undoubtedly slowly changed their modes, of subsistence over the centuries', each one .came- to occupy a rather well-defined and often quite' narrow ecological niche in adjustment with the other castes sharing the locality with them. It is ,in (this context that we must understand the cultural restraints on resource utilization that the Indian society had-evolved.
The Indian subcontinent abounds in a variety of traditions of restraints on the exploitation of wild plant and animal resources. These traditions relate to the territory over which a given human group may exploit the plants and animals, the season in which the exploitation is permitted, the sex and stage in life history for which! exploitation is permitted, the method of exploitations and quantum which may be never be exploited, the species or the biological communities which may never be exploited by some or all castes, and the species in the exploitation of which a given' caste may be specialized. We shall discuss below several specific examples of these various practices.
For most of the evolutionary history human societies have been organized in hunting-gathering tribes each jwith its own exclusive territory (Lee and. De Vore 1968). This territoreality, persisted in one form or the other with all Indian castes till recent times. Thus the beach-seine fishermen of Goa on West Coast report that
120 seines from each fishing village would operate on the coast within a well-defined limit. Similarly, Nandivallas are nomadic caste of entertainers of Western Maharashtra. They also engage in extensive hunting with the dogs for porcupines, monitor lizards, wild pigs etc. Each group of the Nandivallas entertains and hunts within a well-defined territory (Malhotra 1974). Similarly, pastorals like the Dhanger shepherds of Western Maharastra wander extensively grazing over an area defined for and hereditarily controlled by various groups of shepherds (Gadgil and Malhotra, 1983). This territoriality had two significant consequences. Firstly, the pressure of exploitation was evenly dispersed over the exploited plant and animal populations. Secondly, each group had an awareness that the resources of its hereditary territory had sustained it for generations, and were to sustain their descendents, who would inherit the territory and their mode of resource exploitation, for generations to come. This facilitated the cultural evolution of a variety of other restraints on the exploitation of living resources.
- Closed seasons
The Hindu month of Sravana (roughly August) which coincides with the peak of the main rainy season over most of India is a period during which many castes abstain totally from consumption of fish, poultry, meat and consequently suspend all hunting as well. The harvest of certain wild plants is ritually restricted to certain days of the year. Thus in the Jakhol-Panchgai area of Uttarkashi district of Himalayas the tubers of a plant, locally known as Nakhdul may be harvested only at the time of a religious festival, as is also the case with flowers of Brahmakamal a herb of alpine meadows near the Nandadevi peak in Chamoli district of Himalayas (Bahuguna 1980, Bhatt 1981 b).
- Life history stages
The famous Indian epic, Ramayana begins with the scene where the poet -a member of a hunting tribe - is inspired to compose poetry for the first time in his life on witnessing the killing of one of a pair of copulating cranes; such a killing being strictly against the prevailing ethic (Shastri, 1959). In fact heronaries -breeding colonies of storks, egrets, herons, ibises, cormorants, pelicans, etc. - almost invariably receive full protection from the village closest to the heronary. For instance, in the Bangalore district of South India is a village known as Kokre-Bellur (literally village of the storks) where painted storks and grey pelicans have bred on trees lining the village streets since time immemorial. The villagers not only chase away the hunters, they even chase away photographers if they disturb nesting birds. The villagers are often quite rationally aware of the value of the bird guano as fertilizer for their fields.In Bhandara district of Maharashtra the traditional fishing castes never disturb the spawning aggregations of fresh water fishes in the hill streams (Chitampalli ,1981), while the hunting tribe of Phaseparadhis of Ahmadnagar district of Maharashtra whose main quarry is the blackbuck report, that they traditionally let loose any fawns and pregnant does caught in their snares (Khomne, Malhotra and Gadgil 1983).
- Method anc quantum of exploitation
The freshwater fishes of the river Yamuna in its upper reaches in the Jainpur tract of the Himalayan district of f ehri-Garhwal are exploited through netting as well as poisoning. Traditionally netting was" permitted at any time of the year, but poisoning was permitted only at one time of the year for a few days in conjunction with a communal festival known as Maun Mela. This festival is at a time when the river is in spate and the effect of jthe poisoning is probably quite restricted in time. The fish are poisoned and consumed by all the meat-eating castes of the- tract as a communal endeavour (Bahuguna ,1980).
Many Indian villages maintained a village forest on communal land. The village forests were protected and carefully exploited by the village community as a whole. There were often well specified limits on the quantum of exploitation for material such as fuel wood from these village forests. Thus, only one member of each household gathers fuel wood once a week from tne village forest of Gopeshwar in Chamoli district of Uttar Pradesh Himalayas. In consequence, this village forest is still well preserved, although most of the neighboring land has been completely deforested.
There occur throughout India patches of vegetation, or sacred groves which receive special protection from the local community on grounds of their association with some deity. As will be explained below, most of these sacred groves were traditionally free from any exploitation. There are however groves known as Orans associated with the' goddess Jogmaya In the Aravalli hills of Western India where it was permitted to take away wobd for fuel so long as the collection did not involve the use of any metal implements (Ishwar Prakash 1980),
- Sacred groves, pools and ponds
As Gause's (1934) classical experiments have shown, a very effective way of preventing the extinction of prey populations in a predator-prey system is to provide the prey with refugia or regions in which the prey is immune from predation. Such a traditional system | of refugia in India was the network of sacred groves, ponds and pools in the courses of rivers and streams (Gadgil and Vartaks, 1976 and 1981). These were patches of land or water which were dedicated to some deity and were kept free of all exploitation, both of plant and animals. They ranged in extent from fifty hectares or more to a few hundred square meters. Where the network of sacred groves has remained intact till recent times, as in the South Kanara district on the West' Coast, one can see that they formed islands of climax vegetation at densities of 2 to 3 per km2 ranging in size from a small clump to a hectare or more, and originally covering, perhaps 5 percent of the land area (Karanth 1981). This must have been a very effective way of preserving tropical biological diversity for we are still discovering new species of plants, species which have disappeared" from everywhere else', in these sacred groves, as for instance the recently discovered woody climber, Kunstleria keralensis (Mohannan and Nair 1981).
In Bangladesh every shrine has at-least one pond attached to it, and the animals in such ponds are inviolate. Two of such sacred ponds are of biological interest for they harbour populations of endangered species; the Byazid Bostami has a turtle Trionyx n igricans, and Khan Jahan Ali has marsh crocodile. The former is of particular interest since it is the only known population of this turtle in the world. It is notable that the Muslim shrine of Byazid Bostami was apparently built around 800 A. D. at a spot which was earlier occupied by a Buddhist shrine. Thus the tradition of protection of the turtle and the sacred pond is likely to be an ancient tradition assimilated by Islam (Raza Khan 1980).
- Sacred plants and animals
In India a variety of plant and animal species have been considered sacred by one or more communities and therefore never destroyed (Presler 1971). The most widely protected of such organisms is the peepal tree (Ficus religiosa), found depicted on Mohanjodaro seal of around 2000 B.C. Other species of the genus Ficus are also considered sacred, and were not felled traditionally by all Hindu castes. It is notable that Ficus is now considered a genus of particular significance in the overall maintenance of tropical biological diversity — a keystone mutualist (Gilbert 1980). In particular, its preservation may have helped maintain high levels of populations of highly edible frugivorous birds, especially pigeons and doves.
Monkeys are a group of animals held as widely sacred as the Ficus trees over vmost of India, except for Coorg, Kerala and the Northeastern tribal tract. They are never hunted even if they do considerable damage to the cultivated plants, but merely chased away. Unike the Ficus trees, it is difficult to see any rationale in their protection which may relate more plausibly to their close resemblance to man.
Other plants and animals receive less universal protection, being sacred only in particular locations or to particular castes. The peafowl, for example, is sacred to Lord Kartikeya and is never hunted, and is consequently abundant around Kartikeya temples, in the southern state of Tamilnadu. It is more widely protected all over the Western states of Gujarath and Rajasthan (Personal observation). The blue rock pigeon (Columba iivia) is considered sacred to the saint Hazrat Shah Jalal and is protected and encouraged to breed in artificial nest baskets in rural Bangladesh (Raza Khan 1981). Even the rodents are protected and abound in the famous temple of Karnimata goddess in the state of Rajasthan (Ishwar Prakash 1980).
Two notable animals which receive such localized protection in the vicinity of temples of certain deities are the two most feared animals of India : the tiger and the cobra. Within a few kilometers of the temple of the tiger goddess Waghjai of Maharashtra, for example, no tiger or panther is hunted. In turn, it is believed, grlhat the tiger or panther will never kill any man or deomstic animal within that locality. In a similar fashion, no cobra is killed near certain temples and it is believed that no snake-bite will ever be fatal in the same locality (Personal observation). These taboos may help to remove the fear of these very dangerous animals and may have survival value as, for example, if many deaths from snakebite are due to fear of death rather', than from the poison.
Many castes or clans within the castes have certain totemic plants or animals which they do not destory or let others destroy if they can help it. Thus the Maratha clans of Mores and Ghorapades from harashtra derive their clan names from their totemic animals—peafowl and monitor lizard respectively and will protect these animals, although other clans of the same Maratha caste will hunt and eat them (Personal observations)
By far the most remarkable examples of protection to certain species is that of the Bishnoi sect of Western India (Ishwar Prakash and Ghosh 1980, Gadgil 1980a).' This Hindu sect, founded in 1485 A. D. enjoins its followers never to cut a green tree, or kill any animal. They | hold as specially sacred the khejdi tree (Prosopis cinerarea) which is by far the economically most valuable tree in the desert tracts in which this sect originated, lit is recorded that in 1630 A. D. 363 Bishnois sacrificed their lives to prevent the! king of Jodhpur from cutting down P. cineraria trees to furnish the fuel for the lime-kilns to build a new palace. The Bishnois also protect the wild animals including blackbuck and chinkara. To this day, the tradition is very much alive and the Bishnoi villages are a refreshing scene of greenery and plentiful wild life in the Indian desert.
- Niche specialization
The various castes living within a small geographical region showed everywhere adjustments in their utilization of, natural resources so that each caste specialized in the use of some narrow range of resources and overlapped little with other castes of the same region. The consequence was that a given resource of a given locality sustained one relatively small homogeneous endogamous and self governing group over a long time span. These sconditions must have facilitated the cultural evolution of restraints on overexploitation of living resources.
Two specific examples of such niche diversification may be cited here. The region of the crestline of the Western Ghats in Maharashtra around lat. 18°N. is inhabited by two 'major castes, Kunbis and Gavlis. Of these the Kunbis practice paddy cultivation 6n the hill slopes'. They indulge extensively in hunting. They barter their cereal 'grains for butter 'produced by the Gavlis. The Kunbis keep only a few cattle for draft purposes. The Gavlis on the other hand live on the upper hill terraces on which they do a little shifting cultivation. Their major occupation is keeping buffaloes and cattle. They curdle the milk, consume the buttermilk at home and barter the butter for cereal grains from the Kunbis. The Gavlis get their protein supply from (the buttermilk and do no hunting. Thus the cultivation of valleys and lower hill slopes is restricted to Kunbis and the cultivation of upper hill slopes and of hill terraces to Gavlis, maintenance of domesticated animals and exploitation of all fodder and grazinglis restricated to Gavlis and hunting of wild animals to Kunbis (Gadgil and Malhotra 1982a).
Another interesting instance of niche diversification is provided by three nomadic hunting communities of semi-arid tracts of Western Maharashtra; Nandivallas, Phaseparadhis and Vaidus (Khomne, Malhotra and Gadgil, 1983). The primary occupation of Nandivallas is entertainment and fortune telling, that of Vaidus dispensation of herbal medicines, while Phaseparadhis are specialist huntergatherers. "A The Nandivallas and Vaidus, unlike the settled castes, do a great deal of hunting in addition to their primary occupations. It turns out that the three castes use distinctly different hunting techniques and specialize on different prey species. Thus Nandivallas concentrate on hunting with dogs and go for wild pig, procupine and monitor lizard. The Vaidus use baited traps for hunting smaller carnivores such as mongooses, civets, jackals and cats, while the Phaseparadhis specialize in snaring blackbuck, deer and birds.
- Protection by rulers
The ruling classes of India collected agricultural surplus from the rural areas of their own territory as tax and from territories of other rulers as tribute or loot. Their demands on the wild plants and animals were minimal and largely restricted to items of special value such cardamom, sandalwood, musk and ivory. An edict of the Maratha King Shivaji dated around 1660 A.D. forbids the cutting of fruit-bearing trees such as mango and jackfruit for use in building, ships for his navy, on grounds that this would result in considerable suffering for the peasantry in his kingdom. Much more common were the attempts to protect special hunting preserves for the princes and the forest habitats of elephants which were particularly valuable for the armies. Kautilya's Arthasastra, the 4th century B.C. manual of 'statecraft, prescribes the preservation of elephant forests near the borders of the kingdom, their strict supervision including periodic censuses of elephants based on their spoor, and death penalty for any poacher (Kaugle 1969). The use of elephants for war declined only in the 18th century with the large scale introduction of gunpowder, while the practice of maintenance of hunting preserves for princes continued till 1950's (Gee 1964, Ishwar Prakash and Ghosh 1980, Gadgil 1980b).
The Indian subcontinent was probably colonized by hunter-gatherers as early as 50,000 B.C., and continued to support this mode of subsistence till the beginnings of agriculture in the river valleys of northwestern India around 3000 B.C. The hunter-gatherers were presumably organized into tribes with their own territories and may have evolved cultural traditions of protecting resources within these territories. Restrictions on seasons of hunting and hunting of particular stages of life history are likely to have been the most primitive of such restraints. We know nothing of the impact of early agriculture and the Mohanjodaro-Harappa civilization on these practices. Our knowledge of history really begins with the invasion of primarily pastoral Aryans equipped with horses and iron weapons from Central Asia around 1500 B.C. With their iron axes, the Aryans had the ability to clear thick forests and the next 1000 years record a long struggle between the pastoral-agricultural society of invaders with the native hunter-gatherers. At the end of this phase all arable land was taken over from hunter-gatherers who were forced to accept a low status in the castel system, or to retreat to less productive terrain. The gradual spread of agriculture land pastoralism did continue till present times at a slow pace although the settlement, of the vast Indo-Gangetic plains was over by about 500 BX. (Kosambi 1965, Karve 1967).
The caste society which crystallized out of this interaction in the first millenium of the Christian era developed the whole system of sustainable use of living resources and must have remained ecologically in an approximate steady state till the beginning of the British rule jin the late 18th century. By this time Britain had1 largely exhausted its own forests and was hungry for forest raw materials, particularly teakwood for shipbuilding. They therefore strove to establish their hold on the natural resources of the country as quickly as possible, regarding the indigenous cultural traditions of restraint as mere obstacles in their way. This attitude is beautifully illustrated by Buchanan, reporting from the west coast of India in 1801 : The forests are the property of the gods of the villages in which they are situated, and the trees ought not to be cut without having obtained leave from the.........priest to the temple of the village god. The idol receives nothing for granting this permission ; but the j neglect of the ceremony of asking his leave brings vengence £on the guilty'person. This seems, therefore, merely a contrivance to prevent the government from claiming the property". (Buchanan 1802; reprinted 1956).
The village gods and the people had perforce to yield quickly to the will of the rulers who claimed a lion's share of the natural resources so carefully husbanded by the .local village communities over the centuries. This takeover was followed initially by completely unregulated exploitation for the first hundred years of the British rule till its final consolidation after the. war of 1857. The 1850's saw the beginning of the laying down of the great network of railway lines through the length and breadth of the country to complete its conversion into a supplier of raw. material and a market of finished goods for imperial Britain (Dutt 1960). This generated an enormous demand for wood for railway sleepers. To meet this demand at as little costjas possible, the Government decided to legally take over a large fraction of communally owned forests without any compensation. This move was strongly resisted (and there were agitations from 1860-1930' as the reservation of forests was continued in more and more remote corners of the country. The agitations even led to the shooting of people as at the Tiladi massacre of Tehri-Garhwal around II930 (Bahuguna J1980).
When large tracts of forests constituting more than one-fifth of India's land mass were taken over by the Government for management, it had to lay down another set of regulations to ensure due restraint in the utilization of these resources-These regulations now had ' their' rationale, not in tradition or religion, but in modern science, and this ushered in the era of modern scientific forestry in India (Sag'reiya 1967).' As a renewable resource, the forest stack was supposed to be so manipulated as. to result in maximum sustainable yield. A whole system of working plans and their execution was developed to implement this principle. There has been however a very wide gap between this theory and what has happened on ground. I would like to consider here just two case histories, that of bamboo resources of Karnataka and of the Himalayan forests.
The monsoon forests of India are very rich in bamboo stocks which have traditionally been the most important raw material for rural housing and various implements, and the basis of livelihood of a large community of basket-weavers. The management of forests by the Government has however entirely focussed on meeting commercial needs, totally ignoring the traditional needs of the rural population, or at best treating these requirements as privileges most grudgingly conceded and cancelled at the first opportunity. Since bamboo had no commercial value prior to its use by modern paper and pulp industry, it was considered as a weed and earlier forest working plans prescribed its eradication.
When bamboo became a commercial resources for the industry, working plans began to include prescriptions for its extraction based on the principle of sustainable yield. However, determination of such prescriptions need a proper empirical data base "which was totally inadequate. Therefore, the prescriptions that were made were essentially arbitrary and of doubtful value in ensuring the sustainability of the yield. Moreover, when commercial interests come into play, there is a drastic change in the whole attitude towards resource utilization. For now, those that utilize the resources have little stake in its continued existence, and unfortunately the paper industry is not genuinely concerned in sustainable supply of bamboo resoures for two reasons :
(1) The profit margins are so large that the investmant pays for itself very quickly, and the enterpreneur is not concerned if the paper mill has to be closed down and the capital invested elsewhere;
(2) The enterpreneur can go on to the use of other resources such as softwoods and sugarcane bagasse. This pushes up the cost of paper production, but the market is a capitive seller's market and the industry can jack up the paper price without suffering any loss of profit.
These vested interests are so strong that the attempts to ensure sustainable use of resources, themselves based on a totally inadequate empirical data base, are easily vitiated. As a result, the bamboo forests have been all but wiped out in recent decades in many of the Indian states (Gadgil and Prasad 1978, Prasad and Gadgil 1981, Gadgil 1981).
The Uttarkhand region of northwestern Himalayas had retained a good tree cover till early 1960's. This was because the road network in this hilly tract was very poor, and there was little commercial exploitation of the forest. Beginning in early 1960's however a good network of roads was developed and the forests were opened up for ,large scale commercial exploitation. This commercial exploitation was based on working plan which had the objective of ensuring maximum sustainable yield. Unfortunately, the working plans were again drawn up with an inadequate
empirical data base and neglected several crucial factors. With an orientation towards supply of commercial timber, they left out of reckoning the heavy demands on the forests by local populations. They also ignored the vital role of tree cover in ensuring the stability of soil in this geologically highly unstable zone. Furthermore, the vested interests often vitiated whatever discipline the working plans prescribed and prompted overexploitation The consequences were disastrous, landslides and floods resulting in loss of hundreds of human lives and damage to property worth millions of rupees (Bhatt 1980).
Response of the people
The situation in the Himalayas was of course qualitatively no different from what has been happening for over a century all over the country, with the local inhabitants feeling completely J helpless to protect the living resources which still hold a key to their prosperity.. As Presser (1971) has described, the Central Indian tribals saw their traditional shifting cultivation banned to them in 1870'son grounds that it was destructive of forests, only to witness forest constrictors move in and cut down their sacred Sal trees. In consequence, the local communities have been losing or have already lost their own cultural restraints on the utilization of living resources and have become !a party to their destruction. In facts the present pattern of land ownership is such that a local villager or tribal stands to gain little for himself from a piece of tree covered land, since these resources are managed exclusively for the benefit or commercial interests. On the contrary, if he r« i.. tree cover, he has every chance of gaining control over that land for cultivation. As a consequence, the local inhabitants everywhere have been playing a role on par with the commercial interests in destroying the capital of India's living resources (Gadgil and Malhotra 1982b).
While, however, the situation in the Himalayas has been qualitatively the same, the magnitude of suffering 'of the local population has been far greater. This is because the! geologically young Himalayas are very unstable, and the bare mountainsides apt to come down in huge landslides. The disastarous landslides and floods of the recent years have therefore brought a new level of consciousness to the people of Himalayas. The result has been a vigorous grassroots movement, known as the Chipko movement, to save and to regenerate the forests of Himalayas (Bhatt, 1980).
It is this Chipko movement, and more particularly the approach it has developed in the Chamoli district that is the one ray of hope that we may yet turn back the mounting tide of destruction of India's living resources. The approach of the movement may be summed up as follows:
(a) the most important role of forests for India is in meeting the minimum basic needs for fuel, fodder, fertilizer, fruit and fibre for the country's rural masses;
(b) when the local inhabitants begin to derive genuine benefits from the tree cover they will once again have a stake in its preservation
(c) the tree cover can be preserved only under these conditions when those who benefit from it have a genuine concern for its sustainable utilization.
And the Chipko movement has abundantly demonstrated its success, albeit on a restricted scale, in the catchment of Alakananda river and its tributaries. Here, they have succeeded not only in halting the pace of deforestation but also in inspiring the local inhabitants in taking up a vigorous programme of tree planting (Bhatt 1981a).
A number of friends have helped me in putting together this material and I am grateful to them all. In particular I wish to acknowledge my gratitude to: Sundarlal Bahuguna, Chandi Prasad Bhatt, Maruti Chitampalli, Ramachandra Guha, K. Sivaram Karanth, Sudhakar Khomne, Kailash Malhotra, V. M. Meher-Homji, Ishwar Prakash, M. A. Reza Khan, H. C. Sharatchandra, Indra Kumar Sharma, K. Usman and V. D. Vartak.
Author: Madhav Gadgil
* To appear also in culture and conservation Ed. D. Pitt on behalf of commission on Environmental planning international union for conservation of Nature and Nature resources
Bahuguna, Sundarlal, 1980. Personal communication.
Bhatt, C P. 1980. Ecosystam of Central Himalayas and the Chipko Movement. Dashauli Gram Swarajya Sangh, Gopeshwar, U.P., pp. 40.
Bhatt CP. 1981a. Trees—a source of energy for rural development. Himalaya—Man and Nature 5 (4) : 7-13
Bhatt, Chandi Prasad, 1981b. Personal communication.
Biown, L. R. A978. The Twentyninth Day. World Watch Institute, Washington, pp, 363. Buchanan, F 1956. Journay through the northern parts of Kanara. Karwar,
Nagarika Printers. Chitampalli, M. 1981. Personal communication.
Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, pp. 224.
Dutt, Romesh, 1960. The Economic History of India. New Delhi, Government of India
Publications Division. Vol. I, pp. 312 and Vol. II, pp. 476.
Ehrlich, P. R. 1980. The strategy of conservation 1980-2000 in Soule, M. and
Wilcox, B. A. (eds ) Conservation Biology, Sinauer, Sunderland, pp. 329-347
Gadgil, M. 1980a. Guardians of green trees. Hindustan times. New Delhi, 22nd September 1980. Gadgil, M. 1980b. Wild life resources of India; A review. Golden Jubilee Volume. National Acadamy of Sciences, Allahabad, pp. 219-246.
Gadgil, M. 1981. Indian villagers bamboozled by paper companies. IUCN Bulletin 12 : 53-54.
Gadgil, M. 1983. Cultural evolution of ecological prudence, in T. Schultze-Westrum (ed.) Ecocuiture (in press).
Gadgil, M. and Malhotra, K. C. 1982a.' Ecology of a pastoral caste. Gavli 0hangars of peninsular India, Human Ecology 10 : 107—143.
Gadgil. M. and Malhotra K.C. 1982b. :A People's view of Ecodevehpment. Environmental Services Group, New Delhi.
Gadgil, M. and_ Malhotra K. C. 1983. Adaptive significance of the Indian caste system : an ecological perspective. Ann. Human Biol, (in press).
Gadgil, M. and Prasad, S. N. 1978. Vanishing bamboo stocks. Commerce, 136 : 1000-1004.
Gadgil, M. and Vartak, V. D. 1976. Sacred groves of the Western Ghats in India. Economic Botany. 30: 152-160.
Gadgil, M. and Vartak, V. D. 1981. Sacred groves of Maharashtra : an inventory, in S. K. Jain (ed.) Glimpses of Indian Ethnobotany. Oxford University Press, Bombay, pp. 279-294.
Gause, G. D. 1934. The Struggle (or Existence. Hafner, New York, pp.163. Gee, E.P. 1964. Wild life of India- Collins. London, pp. 224.
Gilbert, L.E. 7980. Food web organization and the conservation of neotropical diversity, in Soute M.E. and Wilcox, B.A. (Ed-). Conservation Biology, Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass. pp. 11-33, Harris, M. 1974. Cows. Pigs, wars and Witches:
The riddles of culture. New York : Random House, pp. 276.
Harris, M. 1977. Cannibals and Kings, Collins. Glasgow, pp. 255.
Hutchinson, G. E. 1978. An Introduction to Population Ecology. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 260.
Ishwar Prakash, 1980. Personal communication.
Ishwar Prakash and Ghosh, P. K. 1980. Human-animal interactions in the Rajasthan desert. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 75 (Suppl.) : 1259-1261. Karanth. K. S. 1981.
Karve, I. 1961. Hindu Society, an interpretation, Deccan College, Pune, pp. 171. x
Karve, I. 1967. Yugantho. Deshmukh. Pune, pp. 287.
Kauglee, R. P. 1969. Arthasastra- An English translation with critical notes. 3 parts. University of Bombay, Bombay.
Khomne, S. B., Malhotra, K. C. and Gadgil, M. 1983 On the role of hunting in the nutrition and economy of certain nomadic populations of Maharashtra; Man in India (in press).
Kosambi, D.rD. 1965. The culture and civilization of ancient India in historical outline. Routeledge and Kegan Paul. London pp. 243.
Lack, D. 1954.. The Natural Regulation of Animal Populations, Clarendon. Oxford, pp.343. Lee, R. B. "and Devore, I. (Eds.) 1968. Man the Hunter Aldine, Chicago.
Malhotra, K. C. 1974. Socio-biolo'gical investigations among the Nandivallas of Maharashtra. Bulletin Urgent Anthr. Ethn. Sciences. (Austria) 16 :63-102.
Martin, P. S. and Wright, H. E. (ed.) 1967. Ploistocene Extinctions: the Search for a cause. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Mohanan, C. N. and Nair, N.C. 1981. Kunstlaria Prain—a new genus record for India and a new species in the genus. Proc. Ind. Acad. Soc, B 90 :207 -210.
Prasad, S. N. and Gadgil, M. 1981. Conservation of bamboo resources of Karnataka. Karnataka State Council for Science and Technology, Bangalore, pp. 340.
Presler, H.H. 1971. Primitive Religion of India- Christ. Lit. Soc. Madras, pp.349. Reza Khan, M.A. 1980. The holy turtle of Bangladesh. Hornbill 1980 (4) : 7-11. Reza Khan, M.A. 1981. personal communication.
Sagreiya, K.P. 1967. Forests and Forestry. National Book Trust, New Delhi, pp. 239.
Shastri Hari Prasad, 1959. The Ramayana of Valmiki- 3 Vols. Shanti Sadan, London.
Slobodkin, L.B. 1968. How to be a predator. Amer. Zool., 8 : 43-51. V
Williams,' G.C1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton,pp. 307.)
Wynne-Edwarda, V.C 1962. Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behaviour.
Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, pp. 653.